Introduction
These statistics provide a holistic view of higher-level learning across the further and higher education sectors, covering both higher education and apprenticeships (funded by the Education and Skills Funding Agency and employers, where students earn whilst learning).
The statistics show how higher-level skills provision was organised in 2022/23 and aid our understanding of the potential impacts of the government’s skills reforms. In particular, it will assist future policy understanding for Higher Technical Qualification (HTQ) reform and the flexible Lifelong Loan Entitlement (LLE).
The publication presents analysis of the further and higher education sectors after combining two separate data sources:
- The Education and Skills Funding Agency’s (ESFA) Individualised Learner Record (ILR) data for FEPs, and
- The Higher Education Statistics Agency’s (HESA, now part of Jisc) Student and Alternative Student records for HEPs.
Statistics on learning in further education (opens in a new tab) and higher education (opens in a new tab) have typically been published as separate publications. This makes it complicated to quantify the totality of learning that happens at National Qualifications Framework (NQF) levels 4 to 8. Combined FE and HE statistics are particularly important for understanding learning at education levels 4 and 5, as this is delivered roughly equally across both sectors.
Coverage
This release refers only to learners in England studying at National Qualifications Framework (NQF) Levels 4 to 8 (opens in a new tab).
Analysis is presented for English-domiciled learners to reflect funding eligibility more closely and allow for consistent comparisons across both HESA and ILR sources.
Most of the data included in this release refers to academic year 2022/23. However, detailed time series data for all academic years back to 2015/16 can be found in the underlying data files. Please note, figures may differ slightly to previous iterations of this release due to revisions in the underlying data and methodology over time.
Changes in this release
For the first time, a breakdown of higher-level learners by the local authority of their permanent address prior to study is available to be downloaded from the underlying data.
HESA and Data Futures
For the 2022/23 academic year, Jisc introduced a new collection system, the HESA Data Platform (HDP), and a new data model (Data Futures), designed to meet the needs of the current funding and regulatory landscape. As a result of these changes to the model, in this first year of collection there have been a larger number of data quality issues compared to previous years. Therefore, we advise caution when comparing higher education figures across the time series. Further information can be found in the Methodologies section of this release.
Timeliness
The timeliness of this publication has been impacted by the delay in availability of the HESA Student Record data for the 2022/23 academic year. The delay to the 2022/23 Student Record resulted from complexity in implementing the new data model and data collection systems across the UK higher education sector. The 2022/23 Student record was published in August 2024, delayed from the usual January publishing timeframe. Further information can be found on the HESA website (opens in a new tab).
COVID-19 impacts
HESA published a COVID-19 insight brief (opens in a new tab) (opens in a new tab) that analyses the impact of the pandemic on student data and trends across the years of enrolments and qualifications across various characteristics.
The varying COVID-19 restrictions will also have impacted on apprenticeships and traineeship learning as well as provider reporting behaviour via the Individualised Learner Record. For example, a number of providers experienced administrative hold-ups resulting in some achievements that were not reported in the 2019/20 academic year being carried over to 2020/21 or 2021/22.
Additional care should be taken in comparing and interpreting data for academic years 2019/20 and beyond in this release.
Background
To produce these statistics, information has been standardised across both the ILR and HESA datasets. Extensive data processing is required to harmonise the information across the HESA and ILR data and remove duplicate records.
Learners can be recorded twice through both collections and duplicates have been removed. Where there is a duplication of learners across the ILR and HESA records, the HESA record is retained. The only exception to this is in the case of apprenticeships, where the ILR record is considered the authoritative record of the learning.
Apprenticeships are a count of programmes recorded in the ILR and undertaken in an academic year. An apprenticeship programme can contain multiple component qualifications, which make up part of the overarching apprenticeship framework or standard. In line with other official statistics publications on apprenticeships, the overarching programme is counted rather than the component qualifications. Component qualifications like degrees would normally be classed under OfS-recognised HE learning, but the overarching apprenticeship programmes are prioritised as the type of higher-level learning in this release.
Apprenticeships are included in this release if they were at National Qualifications Framework (NQF) levels 4 and above. Counts differ slightly to other official statistics publications on apprenticeships due to the restriction of English-domiciled learners only in this release.
This publication can only report the higher-level learning that is recorded in administrative data held by government. There is likely to be some unfunded learning in FE providers that is not recorded as it is only mandatory for providers to record information in the ILR for their ESFA-funded learners. There may also be higher-level learning in the private sector that is not recorded in administrative data held by government. This means that any reference to an “Other Higher level - Unfunded” category of learners should be considered a lower bound estimate.
Rounding and suppression
The Code of Practice for Official Statistics (opens in a new tab) requires DfE to take reasonable steps to ensure that its published or disseminated statistics protect confidentiality.
Throughout the publication, all numbers are rounded to the nearest 5 to preserve confidentiality. Percentages are calculated on pre-rounded data but are not published if they are fractions of a small group of people (fewer than 22.5).
Due to rounding, it is possible that the sum of the category percentages may not always total to 100%.