Disadvantage status and pupil premium
Pupils were considered disadvantaged in year 11 and were eligible for pupil premium funding if they had been eligible for free school meals at any point in the last six years, had been looked after by the local authority, or had been adopted from care. Pupils eligible for free school meals are a subset of the wider disadvantaged group. See methodology for details.
Disadvantage status
Disadvantaged pupils are less likely to have a sustained destination
Disadvantaged pupils (those eligible for pupil premium (opens in a new tab) funding) were less likely to have a sustained destination (87.8%) than all other pupils (96.0%).
The most common destination for disadvantaged pupils was further education (43.3%), compared to a school sixth form destination (25.4%) for all other pupils.
Disadvantaged pupils were more likely to enter an employment destination and less likely to go into a sustained apprenticeship than all other pupils. Disadvantaged pupils were also more likely not to sustain a destination (10.7%) compared to all other pupils (3.2%).
Gender
Female pupils were more likely to sustain a destination than male pupils
This was driven by female pupils being 3.7 percentage points more likely to sustain an education destination. Conversely, male pupils were more likely to sustain an apprenticeship or employment destination.
Disadvantage status and gender
Disadvantaged male pupils were least likely to sustain a destination
Non-disadvantaged female pupils were most likely to sustain an education, apprenticeship or employment destination. There was a 7.6 percentage points gap between non-disadvantaged female students and disadvantaged female students and 8.7 percentage points gap between non-disadvantaged male students and disadvantaged male students.
Non-disadvantaged female pupils were most likely to sustain an education destination. This was 3.9, 9.7 and 12.7 percentage points higher than non- disadvantaged males, disadvantaged females and disadvantaged males, respectively.
Non-disadvantaged male pupils were most likely to sustain an apprenticeship destination. This was 2.3, 1.9 and 2.5 percentage points higher than non-disadvantaged females, disadvantaged males and disadvantaged females, respectively.
Disadvantaged male pupils were most likely to sustain an employment destination. This was 2.0, 0.4 and 2.8 percentage points higher than non-disadvantaged males, disadvantaged females and non-disadvantaged females, respectively.
Ethnicity
Pupils from Indian and Chinese backgrounds were most likely to sustain a destination
This was driven by these students being most likely to sustain an education destination. Pupils from Gypsy Roma backgrounds were least likely to sustain an education destination.
Pupils from Gypsy Roma and Traveller of Irish Heritage backgrounds were most likely to sustain employment destinations. These two groups are relatively small and their outcomes are volatile between years. Pupils from Black African, Bangladeshi, Indian, Any Other Asian and Chinese backgrounds were least likely to sustain employment destinations.
SEN support and Education, health and care plans
SEN support is given in school. It can include, for example, a special learning programme, extra help from a teacher or assistant, to work in a small group, observation in class or at break, help taking part in class activities etc.
Education, health and care plans (EHC) are for young people, aged up to 25, who need more support than is available through special educational needs support. EHC plans identify educational, health and social needs and set out the additional support to meet those needs.
Special Educational Needs
Pupils with no identified special educational need (SEN) were most likely to sustain any destination; those pupils with SEN support were least likely to sustain an education, apprenticeship or employment destination.
87.5% of pupils with no identified SEN sustained an education destination. This was 8.0, 7.1 and 2.1 percentage points greater than pupils who had SEN support, those who had identified SEN and those who had Education Health and Care plans.
Similar proportions of pupils who had no identified SEN and those with SEN support sustained apprenticeship destinations. Those who had SEN support were most likely to sustain an employment destination.