Data set from Progression to higher education or training

Progression to higher education and training institution level destinations

Latest data
Published
Last updated
Progression to higher education or training by institution, location, student characteristics and provider type

Data set details

Theme
Destination of pupils and students
Publication
Progression to higher education or training
Release type
Number of rows
21,744
Geographic levels
School
Indicators
  • Academic/AGQ students who sustained L4+ destination
  • Number of pupils studying academic or applied general qualifications
  • Number of pupils studying level 3 qualifications
Filters
  • Data type
  • Institution group
  • Student characteristic
Time period
2021/22

Data set preview

Table showing first 5 rows, from underlying data
time_periodtime_identifiergeographic_levelcountry_codecountry_nameregion_coderegion_nameold_la_codenew_la_codela_namelocal_authority_selection_statusschool_urnschool_laestabschool_nameadmission_policyentry_genderinstitution_groupinstitution_typebreakdown_topicbreakdowndata_typeall_cohortall_progressedall_degreeall_top3rdall_apprenall_htechacag_cohortacag_progressedtlev_cohorttlev_progressedotl3_cohortotl3_progressed
202122Academic yearSchoolE92000001EnglandE12000001North East390E08000037GatesheadNone1084103904041Kingsmeadow Community Comprehensive SchoolNon selectiveMixedState-funded mainstream schoolsCommunity SchoolDisadvantage statusDisadvantagedNumber of pupils3ccccccccc0c
202122Academic yearSchoolE92000001EnglandE12000001North East390E08000037GatesheadNone1084103904041Kingsmeadow Community Comprehensive SchoolNon selectiveMixedState-funded mainstream schoolsCommunity SchoolDisadvantage statusNot disadvantagedNumber of pupils14ccc0ccccc0c
202122Academic yearSchoolE92000001EnglandE12000001North East390E08000037GatesheadNone1084103904041Kingsmeadow Community Comprehensive SchoolNon selectiveMixedState-funded mainstream schoolsCommunity SchoolSexFemaleNumber of pupils3ccccc2c1c0c
202122Academic yearSchoolE92000001EnglandE12000001North East390E08000037GatesheadNone1084103904041Kingsmeadow Community Comprehensive SchoolNon selectiveMixedState-funded mainstream schoolsCommunity SchoolSexMaleNumber of pupils14981011490c00
202122Academic yearSchoolE92000001EnglandE12000001North East390E08000037GatesheadNone1084103904041Kingsmeadow Community Comprehensive SchoolNon selectiveMixedState-funded mainstream schoolsCommunity SchoolTotalTotalNumber of pupils17111020116111c00

Variables in this data set

Table showing first 5 of 15 variables
Variable nameVariable description
acag_cohortNumber of pupils studying academic or applied general qualifications
acag_progressedAcademic/AGQ students who sustained L4+ destination
all_apprenSustained apprenticeship destination
all_cohortNumber of pupils studying level 3 qualifications
all_degreeSustained degree destination

Footnotes

  1. Note that the methodology used to determine the top third Higher Education Institutions changed in 2020 for the 2016/17 cohort. Instead of the top 33% of institutions, institutions are now only added to the list until 33% of the student intake is represented. Additionally, qualifications equivalent to A levels are now included in the process, rather than solely A levels. Top third results from the 2015/16 cohort are thus not directly comparable with 2016/17 and later cohorts.
  2. Other level 3 qualifications are those that are not included elsewhere in 16-18 performance tables.
  3. Disadvantage status is given as in year 11. Disadvantaged students are defined as those who were eligible for free school meals at any point in the previous six years or having been looked after by their local authority. These are the students who would have been in receipt of the pupil premium when in year 11. Students with no key stage 4 record were not known to be disadvantaged in year 11 and are included in all other students.
  4. Note that the methodology used to determine the top third Higher Education Institutions changed in 2024 for the 2020/21 cohort.  The change is covered in detail within the accompanying methodology document.
  5. The way we decide when a student is at the end of 16 to 18 study changed for the 2020/21 and 2021/22 cohorts.  This change means the make up of these cohorts are different to previous years, and also to each other due to effects from the transition from the old criteria to the new. As such any comparison to previous years should be avoided.

Using this data

  • Download the underlying data as a compressed ZIP file

  • View or create your own tables

    View tables that we have built for you, or create your own tables from open data using our table tool

Download this data using code

Access this data using common programming languages using the URL below.

Example code